PARTNER SCHOOLS EVALUATION OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS PERFORMANCE DURING FIELD PRACTICE: A CASE STUDY FROM FKIP UMMY SOLOK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v11i1.1183Keywords:
Field practice evaluation, pre-service teachers, partner school assessment, teaching competencies, teacher educationAbstract
This study examines the performance evaluation of Field Practice (PLK) students from the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education (FKIP) UMMY Solok in 2025 based on assessments from partner schools. The research employed a descriptive quantitative method, collecting data through structured questionnaires distributed to supervising teachers at partner schools. Six key competency areas were assessed: professional ethics, communication skills, technology integration, teamwork and collegial collaboration, self-development and reflective practice, and teaching competence. The results indicate that PLK students demonstrated strong performance across all evaluated dimensions, with 100% of respondents rating teamwork and collegial collaboration, self-development and reflective practice, and teaching competence as "Good", while ethics and technology integration received 75% "Good" ratings and communication skills achieved 50% "Very Good" and 50% "Good" ratings. No "Sufficient" or "Poor" ratings were recorded in any category. These findings suggest that the PLK program at FKIP UMMY Solok effectively prepares pre-service teachers with essential competencies required in school settings, though continuous improvement in ethics and technology integration remains necessary.
References
Adhia, H., Marta, R.A, Roza, H. et al. (2025). Analisis kepuasan sekolah mitra terhadap mahasiswa Praktik Lapangan Kependidikan (PLK) FKIP UMMY Tahun 2024. Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 5(1), 44-53.
Adhia, H., Marta, R.A, Roza, H. et al. (2024). Analisis kepuasan sekolah mitra terhadap mahasiswa Praktik Lapangan Kependidikan (PLK) FKIP UMMY Tahun 2023. Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 4(2), 310-318.
Adhia, H., Roza, H., Dwiputri, R. et al (2024). Analisis kepuasan sekolah mitra terhadap mahasiswa Praktik Lapangan Kependidikan (PLK) FKIP UMMY. Tahun 2022. Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 4(1), 111-119.
Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2002). Components of a good practicum placement: Student teacher perceptions. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 81–98.
Borko, H., & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 501–518.
Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice Makes Practice: A Critical Study of Learning to Teach. State University of New York Press.
Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163–202.
Colnerud, G., & Granström, K. (2020). Respect for and mistrust towards teachers: How students experience the digital policy of schools and the rights and wrongs of teachers' use of software to monitor students' computers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(5), 664-677.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs. Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2020). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers should Learn and be able to Do. John Wiley & Sons.
Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219–232.
Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Brindley, S. (2008). Practice makes perfect? Learning to learn as a teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 34(2), 159–178.
Hudson, P. (2013). Mentoring as professional development: ‘Growth for both’ mentor and mentee. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 771–783.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2019). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1-7). Springer.
Korthagen, F. A., & Vasalos, A. (2022). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 47-71.
Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.
McLean Davies, L., & Buzza, D. (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Teacher Education Research. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinardi, J., Rahman, A., Basuki, B., Artuti, E., & Ratnawati, O. A. (2024). Mentor teachers’ perceptions toward the pedagogical competence of pre-service teacher professional education, FKIP, University of Palangkaraya in practical field experience. Jurnal Pendidikan, 25(1), 22–33.
Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 116–126.
Stronge, J. H., & Hindman, J. L. (2021). The teacher quality index: A protocol for teacher selection. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tang, S. Y. F. (2003). Challenge and support: The dynamics of student teachers’ professional learning in the field experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 483–498.
Tim Penyusun. (2022). Buku Pedoman dan Penilaian PLK. FKIP UMMY Press.
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2018). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40.
Yusuf, B., Sujarwo, S. & Juniarto, M. (2025). Persepsi guru pamong terhadap kompetensi mahasisa PKM Penjas pada sekolah mitra UNJ tahun 2024. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 11(4B), 39-48.
